Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Indefinite semi-protection: High level of vandalism , changing of name & entering of pin-codes by unregistered users. Maheep Singh24 (talk) 10:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editing to reinsert contentious material which has no secondary sourcing. Only sourced by WP:BLPPRIMARY. TarnishedPathtalk 13:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: A lot of vandalism, the article gets changed from “P. Diddy’s Starmaker to P. Diddy’s sex toys and baby oil. He is a controversial subject Wcamp9 (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing and repeated IP/new user vandalism re-ensuing after the end of a previous page protection. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 15:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Well, IP users have recently been making a series of unnecessary grammatical fixes which have become difficult to navigate in the event of multiple edits by such users. Hence, seeking protection for this page. MSincccc (talk) 15:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending changes: Page may be prone to vandalism as the figures are very popular at the moment. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 15:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the page is constatnly the target of vandalism. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of incorrect/unsuitable image by an IP editor who refuses to engage on article talk page. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection: spammer. The Banner talk 16:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Continuously inserting flag icon into infobox. Annh07 (talk) 17:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is likely to get vandalised persistently as long as the 2023-2024 Manipur violence continues. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High IP vandalism changing budget and boxoffice numbers without sources. RangersRus (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Consistent IP vandalism, IPs have already created accounts to get around the pending changes lock on the page. Sinclairian (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:04, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent and repeated vandalism by multiple unregistered users over several months for commercial advertisement. VoluntasDei (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Cambial foliar❧ 20:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Former pastor who confessed to sexual abuse. The man himself may not deserve protection, but his page does, as it has recently suffered a fair bit of the sort of emotionally charged edit-warring that would be expected in this situation. — HelpMyUnbelief (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:90E1:86C6:BEFE:2D55 (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: Three years ago, this page was extended-confirmed protected due to an edit war. I talked to the protecting admin and stated that there is zero chance for him to unprotect the article. Would consider downgrading the protection to semi. ScarletViolet tc 11:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: For some clarification, since I found this to be a little confusing, here's the link to their discussion. Zinnober9 (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotection: primary reason for protection no longer relevant due to reds hiring being made official. Will120 (talk) 17:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    I would like to request that... Updating the image and description below because Th3 3ra is now complete. Time for changes. Bnika33 (talk) 18:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.