User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Shakespearesboy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Jhon223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Pink film (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2603:9001:902:C205:24C3:5560:DC9:13E5 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Cool Boy F: Removing speedy deletion template. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 02:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- 60.89.3.139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Talk:Dodgeball (diff): Japanese cross-wiki dodgeball vandal LTA strikes again. The previous incarnation of this in August was IP 114.145.238.135 which was blocked for two days that time for spamming the same ol' bullshit edit requests on this article's talk page. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Starkindustriesgaurav (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 04:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. but seems to be a vandal-only candidate. Watching.-- Alexf(talk) 09:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- ОбельЕСЕпР (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Mitchelyn tyres1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 18:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Steel Hat Productions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Casting about the net, this doesn't appear to be a company. I think it's a person's personal presence on the Internet. Therefore, it doesn't appear to represent a group. I'm declining this for now, but maybe keep an eye on their edits. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The edit-warring concerning the box office gross has started up again. Skywatcher68 (talk) 03:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism from multiple IPs/Accounts Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 04:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism altering school to include information about facility in Nigeria Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Deceased user, please protect the local user page per policy. Regards, Aafi (talk) 08:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP WP:CRV edits. Brat Forelli🦊 09:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. As previous attempts at warning and blocking the disruptive user seemed futile, and this is the only affected page, the least we can do is have the pending changes protection to protect against the user's constant disruptive editing, while still allowing for constructive edits. Chyx1095 (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: Wide consensus is good. ND61F (talk) 06:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ND61F, users with less than 500 edits and 30 days of experience can't engage in that topic area unless they're simply making edit requests. "Wide consensus" on that page move discussion isn't possible, at least not in the way you seem to be thinking. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- I acknowledge the existing guidelines regarding user participation in specific topic areas based on edit count and experience. While I respect these restrictions, I believe that fostering a more inclusive environment could benefit our community. ND61F (talk) 06:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- And I respect your opinion, although I have to say that there's no point requesting this because the page's protection level isn't going to be decreased to allow for participation in that discussion by non-extended confirmed editors; the guidelines are quite strict with regards to contentious topic areas. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ND61F: ArbCom wouldn't have imposed the 500/30 restriction unless every lesser method to try and kerb the disruption was failing or had already failed. And the fact that a fifth ARBPIA case was recently spitballed by ArbCom should tell you that the 500/30 restrictions are themselves failing to kerb the disruption in this very emotionally-charged ethno-political topic area. That is not an argument to ignore the restrictions. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- I acknowledge the existing guidelines regarding user participation in specific topic areas based on edit count and experience. While I respect these restrictions, I believe that fostering a more inclusive environment could benefit our community. ND61F (talk) 06:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 20 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 07:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
|---|
Account creator[edit] |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
A good editor and content creator, they have created a total of 133 articles. One was deleted via G14 in 2022, and another was deleted via A3 back in 2014. Since then, they have created many BLPs and other topic articles, none of which have been deleted. I think they are good to go. GrabUp - Talk 16:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including
I would like to introduce another editor with a strong history of editing and article creation. They have created 2,114 articles, including 2 GAs. Their creations include BLPs, which are essential for obtaining the AP flag. Only one of their articles was deleted in 2023 via AfD, and others are G6. Since then, no articles have been deleted. I believe it would be beneficial to grant them this right to help reduce the NPP backlog. GrabUp - Talk 13:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be an experienced content creator whose creations are no longer in need of input from NPP. They don't have a clean record of their articles being kept at AfD, but the last deletion was a year and half and 60 articles ago, and looking through a random sampling of their work since then doesn't reveal any major issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access for updating census data of highly populated Indian villages in Kerala state and other human settlements on this planet in future. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like access to AWB to fix CheckWiki issues more efficiently than I currently do using WPCleaner. I also want to streamline typo fixing as part of WP:TYPO. I understand I have been denied it twice in the recent past, but I strongly believe that I am fit for getting the permission now, as I gained significantly more experience and done more constructive edits. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like to use AWB's Checkwiki functionality to alter position of references with respect to punctuation and incorrect ISBNs as I am frequently revising pages that need reference issue support; use find and replace for music album title issues; and use AWB for assistance on creating and correcting items and links within categories of music genres, domestic flag information, and public parks. Thank you. Shotgunheist 💬 19:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to get AWB to improve articles' layouts, correcting Spanish settlement infoboxes, changing IPA-va (deprecated) to IPA|ca-valencia, adding IPA, correcting links, etc. I had AWB rights in the past, however I stopped using Wikipedia due to COVID-19. Now I am fully recovered and would like to carry on improving things here and there. Thank you. Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm requesting access for updating articles and doing various small tweaks. Ty. — Sadko (words are wind) 00:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
(My previous request was archived by MusikBot without comment?) I want to change a string "2019 redefinition of the SI base units" to "2019 revision of the SI" across pages that define the SI units. If it works well I may do similar edits in future. I have experience with Wikipedia and scripted file editing generally. Thanks. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
i will use it to correct the citation before the punctuation, on many articles i known User.inu6 (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Editing semi-protected pages M7md AAAA (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Can i please have extended confirmed rights back. I lost it because one day when i had a little less than 500 edits, i made about 45-55 edits in one hour in order to get to 500 edits. Im new to this site and didn't know gaming edits was against the rules. Ever since i lost the extended confirmed thing, I've made hundreds of edits i think are constructive and i stopped vandalism a few times and have a much better understanding of the rules. extended confirmed rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
for quick translation சத்திரத்தான் (talk) 03:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
As an AFC reviewer, article creator, and AFD stalker, I believe that I'm experienced enough to try and help reduce the backlog of new pages. Tavantius (talk) 19:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
My trial NPP rights expired. Hopefully I did ok (probably could have done more haha, just got busy). Would like to keep helping with the backlog PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
My temporary NPP rights expired two days ago and I'd like to gain access once more. Rusty 🐈 16:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
I am interested in technology, basic science, public health, global health, global health diplomacy, foreign policy, public policy and science and technology. I am also interested in African history and history of science and look forward to editing and updating Wikipedia posts in these areas. I also enjoy copy editing articles and adding research on Wikipedia. Trex32 (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
I came here to request that my NPP rights be made permanent. Keep in mind that the two-month trial is set to expire on October 4th, which is less than two weeks from now. I'll be extremely busy for the remainder of this month, next month and the month thereafter, so today is probably the best time to make this request. Thanks for your understanding, Wolverine XI (talk to me) 19:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been active in AfD, AfC, and I patrolled pages back in the day before this was a specific user right. Having it again will help me in the AfC and recent changes queue. cyberdog958Talk 22:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Howdy. Been making a lot of new pages recently and seeing them reviewed by others has made me think I should get in on this and give back a bit. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 02:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights 79lives (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC) I want to alleviate the backlog for people and I have tried contributing to copy editing as well as read WP:NOTABILITY to show which articles could be under the risk of deletion! As soon as I joined Wikipedia I saw a lot of articles without any citations which I would help with. I am also able to identify orphans and unreferenced articles. |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi, as part of working at AfC I come across submissions on editors main userpage or sandbox that need to be cleanly moved to draft (i.e. without leaving a redirect). I stopped moving such submissions years ago as if the editor starts another article I was then the creator rather the actual creator which never seemed right to me. It would also be useful for when new editors create/move drafts to the Wikipedia or Template namespaces either in error or attempting to promote/spam. KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm an experienced user, and would like to help out at pending changes. I know the backlog is small, but I see no reason why I can't spend a bit of time to make it smaller. I have experience in anti-vandalism, and already some *limited* experience reviewing changes at Wikibooks, where I hold the reviewer right (although I am not super active there). Cremastra (talk) 16:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
While I haven't been editing for very long (only a few months), I have rollback rights and frequently revert vandalism. I also review Redirects for Creation, which is under pending changes protection. I've read the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. LR.127 (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now and frequently revert vandalism. However, I often come across constructive edits that I can't do much about. For this reason, I would like to have the pending changes reviewer tool to mark these edits as reviewed and broadly acceptable for public view , allowing me to take on new tasks. Cysquatch (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello i'm TyphoonAmpil. I'm been patrolling recent changes last month. over 150 reverts. i'm mark review WP:AFC/R. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 07:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I would like access to rollback for more efficiently combating vandalism. I have gained experience in patrolling RecentChanges. I also make sure to always warn (and welcome new users) after reverting their edits on their talk page. I declare that I have read through all the policies regarding vandalism. Bunnypranav (talk) 11:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello i'm TyphoonAmpil. i Revert Vandalism single August last month. I'm Patrolling Recent Changes, Very High track record over 150 reverts. i use Anti-Vandal. too slow WP:UV and WP:TW too fast WP:AntiVandal. †TyphoonAmpil† (💬 - 📝 - 🌀 - Tools) 01:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
I have made quite a few edit requests in the Template talk namespace, as well as edits directly in the template namespace. I always test my changes in the sandbox before making edits directly. I am also a Commons admin and have made lots of technical changes in templates there as well. I am currently focussing on turning templates to be dark mode compatible, and many templates and editnotices are template protected. Therefore I request template editor so it can be more easy to implement dark mode compatibility into templates. Thank you, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
|
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 114 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 13 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 18 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 745 |
| Templates for deletion | 123 |
| Categories for deletion | 108 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 16 |
| All redirects for discussion | 513 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 31 |
| Possible copyright violations | 12 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 225 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 13 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 1 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 420 |
| Unknown copyright status | 23 |
| Unknown source | 16 |
| No non-free use rationale | 1 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 14 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 13 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,246 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 450 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,365 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,615 | 0.5 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 5,908 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,314 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 39,111 | 0.57 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 10,965 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 527,225 | 7.66 |
| All articles lacking sources | 82,710 | 1.2 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 685 | 0.06 |
| All articles needing additional references | 464,786 | 6.75 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,565 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,634 | 1.53 |
| All articles with dead external links | 306,379 | 4.45 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 145 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 18 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,680 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 808 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 2 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,239 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 1,023 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,720 | 0.79 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,706 | 0.04 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,445 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,747 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,591 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 324 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,656 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,766 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 3 |
| All articles to be expanded | 66,141 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||